This piece by Rabbi Arik Ascherman on the Temple Mount originally appeared in Israeli publication Makor Rishon.
By: Rabbi Arik Ascherman
Years before I made aliyah, I first visited Israel with my family in 1977. I remember the great excitement with which I prayed at the Kotel with my father (may his memory be a blessing) and my brothers. (In those days, it was impossible for me to also pray alongside my mother.) I grew up with the stories of Yehuda Ha-Levi, and “Jerusalem of Gold” was as known to our lips as “Hatikvah,” and was a part of our tefilah.
Sometimes, it is difficult for Israelis to get why Women of the Wall garnered so much attention and support from outside of Israel. The reason is that for a significant portion of Diaspora Jewry, the Kotel is the beating heart of the Jewish people. The right to pray there is representative of the belonging of the Jewish people. My wife the “sabra,” along with her family, waited in a long long line, enormously excited, so that they could approach the Kotel on Shavuot 1977. Today though, for most Israelis the Kotel no longer is a site of pilgrimage, although it remains as such for many Jews from the Diaspora, and so too the Temple Mount attached to it. This weakened attachment is true even though many Israelis tend to internalize “militant catchphrases” and respond reflexively to any rumored threat to our sovereignty over the Temple Mount.
I (still) share the strong excitement that olim have when they touch the stones of the Kotel. My daughter prayed there when her time to be Bat Mitzvah arrived, and b’ezrat Hashem (with the help of G-d), my son, too, will pray there. I can understand how the words, “The Temple Mount in our hands!” are so moving, and I know well that the things that excite us the most provide the greatest platform for the demagogues among us – even running the risk of avodah zarah/idol worship. Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel (z”l) noted that Shabbat and the holidays were our truest cathedrals, not structures built of stone.
From a religious perspective, it’s known that on the one hand, Rambam writes in the Mishnah Torah that the Messiah will one day rebuild the Temple and herald a return to the sacrifice service (Halachot Malachim 11:1). But Rambam sparked riots when he wrote in Guide for the Perplexed, in accordance with the midrash, that God commanded the worship service in the Temple only because it was difficult for the children of Israel to free themselves from what was already known to them. Maybe it was even a hint that one day we won’t have a need for prayer at all:
“In a similar manner did God provided for all mammals. When such an animal is born, it is extremely tender, and cannot be fed with dry food. Therefore breasts were provided which yield milk, and the young can be fed with moist food which corresponds to the condition of the limbs of the animal, until the latter have gradually become dry and hard.
Many precepts in our law are the result of a similar course adopted by the same Supreme Being. It is, namely, impossible to go suddenly from one extreme to the other: it is therefore according to the nature of man impossible for him suddenly to discontinue everything to which he has been accustomed. […] But the custom which was in those days general among all men, and the general mode of worship in which the Israelites were brought up, consisted in sacrificing animals in those temples which contained certain images, to bow down to those images, and to bum incense before them; religious and ascetic persons were in those days the persons that were devoted to the service in the temples erected to the stars, as has been explained by us. It was in accordance with the wisdom and plan of God, as displayed in the whole Creation, that He did not command us to give up and to discontinue all these manners of service; for to obey such a commandment it would have been contrary to the nature of man, who generally cleaves to that to which he is used; it would in those days have made the same impression as a prophet would make at present if he called us to the service of God and told us in His name, that we should not pray to Him, not fast, not seek His help in time of trouble; that we should serve Him in thought, and not by any action” (Guide for the Perplexed, Part III, Chapter XXXII).
Sometimes we hear that the prophets were against the sacrifices, but that’s an exaggeration. Nonetheless, many times the prophets came out against the ritual’s empty content. The sacrificial service – korban, the root of which (K.R.B.) connects it to the word for “nearness” – was meant to draw us nearer to the way of God:
“To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto Me? says the LORD; I am full of the burnt-offerings of rams, and the fat of fed beasts; and I delight not in the blood of bullocks, or of lambs, or of he-goats.
When you come to appear before Me, who has required this at your hand, to trample My courts?
Bring no more vain oblations; it is an offering of abomination unto Me; new moon and sabbath, the holding of convocations–I cannot endure iniquity along with the solemn assembly.
Your new moons and your appointed seasons My soul hates; they are a burden to Me; I am weary to bear them.
And when ye spread forth your hands, I will hide Mine eyes from you; yea, when you make many prayers, I will not hear; your hands are full of blood.
Wash you, make you clean, put away the evil of your doings from before Mine eyes, cease to do evil;
Learn to do well; seek justice, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow” (Isaiah 1:11-17).
Following the prophets, Rambam says that to understand the intention behind the sacrificial service, we must go back to the command to sacrifice the Paschal lamb in Egypt:
“Because of this principle which I explained to you, the Prophets in their books are frequently found to rebuke their fellow men for being over-zealous and exerting themselves too much in bringing sacrifices: the prophets thus distinctly declared that the object of the sacrifices is not very essential, and that God does not require them. Samuel therefore said, “Hath the Lord as great delight in burnt-offerings and sacrifices as in obeying the voice of the Lord” (1 Sam. 15:22)? Isaiah exclaimed, “To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? saith the Lord” (Isa. 1: 11); Jeremiah declared: “For I spake not unto your fathers, nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt, concerning burnt-offering or sacrifices. But this thing commanded I them, saying, Obey my, voice, and Iwill be your God, and ye shall be my people” (Jer. 7: 22-23). This passage has been found difficult in the opinion of all those whose words I read or heard; they ask: How can Jeremiah say that God did not command us about burnt-offering and sacrifice, seeing so many precepts refer to sacrifice? The sense of the passage agrees with what I explained to you. Jeremiah says [in the name of God] the primary object of the precepts is this: Know me, and serve no other being – “I will be your God, and ye shall be my people” (Lev. 26: 12).
[…] I have another way of explaining this passage with exactly the same result. For it is distinctly stated in Scripture, and handed down by tradition, that the first commandments communicated to us did not include any law at an about burnt-offering and sacrifice. You must not see any difficulty in the Passover which was commanded in Egypt; there was a particular and evident reason for that, as will be explained by me (chap. xlvi.). Besides it was revealed in the land of Egypt; whilst the laws to which Jeremiah alludes in the above passage are those which were revealed after the departure from Egypt. For this reason it is distinctly added, “in the day that I brought them out from the land of Egypt.” The first commandment after the departure from Egypt was given at Marah, in the following words, “If thou wilt diligently hearken to the voice of the Lord thy God, and wilt do that which is right in His sight, and wilt give ear to His commandments” (Exod. xv. 26).” There he made for them a statute and an ordinance, and there he proved them” (ibid. ver. 25). According to the true traditional explanation, Sabbath and civil laws were revealed at Marah: “statute” alludes to Sabbath, and “ordinance” to civil laws, which are the means of removing injustice. The chief object of the Law, as has been shown by us, is the teaching of truths; to which the truth of the creatio ex nihilo belongs. It is known that the object of the law of Sabbath is to confirm and to establish this principle, as we have shown in this treatise (Part. II. chap. xxxi.). In addition to the teaching of truths the Law aims at the removal of injustice from humanity”- (Guide for the Perplexed, ibid.).
Far be it from me to decide between the Mishnah Torah and Rambam’s Guide for the Perplexed to know if the will of God is such that we should rebuild the Temple and renew the Temple service, but when the poskim write that one of the reasons we should not ascend to the Temple Mount is because we are insufficiently pure, my mind goes to the “purity of qualities,” or what we would call integrity. God forbade King David to build the Temple because he had blood on his hands.
The worthiness necessary to build the Temple must come from a desire to know the Creator and to draw near to God’s way. This means that the place and all that occurs in it must serve the purpose of “removing injustice from humanity”: all of humanity regardless of religion, gender, or race, because all of us are created in the Image of God.
Of course, in “all of humanity,” we include our own people. In the 1980s, when I did not even have an inkling of the prohibitions on ascending to the Temple Mount or the suspicions felt by Muslims regarding the matter of the site, we innocently decided, myself and a friend, to walk around the Temple Mount after prayer one day. With my tallit and my siddur still in my hands, I suddenly noticed many young Muslims following after me, and their hostility was plain on their faces.
Today, as President and Senior Rabbi of the organization Rabbis for Human Rights, one that demands that Muslims and Christians have the right of access to their holy sites, it would be hypocritical for me to be fine with the denial of prayer on the Temple Mount to those Jews who believe that we are permitted to pray there. One must not accept the destruction of archaeological finds that attest to our ancient roots on the Temple Mount/Haram al-Sharif any more than one should accept the erasure of the evidence of non-Jewish roots in Silwan/Ir David (the City of David).
So we must ask why, despite all this, there is enmity towards us? There is not one simple answer. Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch teaches that we must not trust ourselves to do justice when all the power lies in our hands, especially to do right by those who are powerless. It “borders on crime” (interpretation of Leviticus 23:22), when the Palestinian people live in a reality in which we exclusively determine the laws of the country; when they live under the oppression of our military regime, this hostility – which has a number of sources – only grows. It’s very similar to the hostility among us towards Arabs when terror and violence increase.
I didn’t pay attention to any public discussion until, a little more than a year ago, the police changed their policy and began accompanying Jewish groups to the Temple Mount for prayer and ceremonies. I wonder if there was some effort to arrive at an agreement or at least an understanding with the Waqf? The several clashes [last week] week were entirely predictable. True, one cannot make peace with or accept Muslim violence or the fact that Jewish prayer on the Temple Mount is automatically considered a “provocation,” but to exploit our overwhelming power just to throw a match into a barrel of explosives is not the solution. “Not by might, nor by power, but by My spirit, says the LORD of hosts” (Zechariah 4:6).
“Who will ascend the mountain of Hashem?”
I’m not so naïve as to believe that overnight, something can lead over 100 years of hostility to fade away, but I do believe that the Temple Mount/Noble Sanctuary should be owned by God alone, and that the way to earn the right to ascend to the Temple Mount and pray there is firstly to be upright and pure of heart. This means, to possess great integrity and to respect all of God’s creatures and their rights. Instead of saying “it is all mine,” we must act towards an agreement and actualize the vision of our prophets on behalf of all those that believe – in their own way – in the God of Jacob:
But in the end of days it shall come to pass, that the mountain of the LORD’S house shall be established as the top of the mountains, and it shall be exalted above the hills; and peoples shall flow unto it.
And many nations shall go and say: ‘Come ye, and let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, and to the house of the God of Jacob; and He will teach us of His ways, and we will walk in His paths’; for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem.
[…] and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war any more.
But they shall sit every man under his vine and under his fig-tree; and none shall make them afraid; for the mouth of the LORD of hosts hath spoken.
For let all the peoples walk each one in the name of its god, but we will walk in the name of the LORD our God for ever and ever (Micah 4:1-5).
Rabbi Ascherman Photo: Dimid Duchov-Korovev
Rabbi Arik Ascherman is president and Senior Rabbi for Rabbis for Human Rights
The post House of my Dreams: Rabbi Ascherman on the Temple Mount appeared first on Rabbis for Human Rights.